Because he will have good response from users and they will buy more that game and maybe next series of game.īut not many people dont understand it. If he is making game Type 1 he is interested to make game as interested as possible and to give you as much pleasure as possible. Because if you get everything from game you will not pay next month subscription fee. If he is making game Type 2 he is interested to make you play every month, so advancement should be hard enough.
If he is making game Type 3 he is interested to make it free to play but hard to advance and to make you to buy as much advancement as possible. That includes some kind of premium accounts and paid game advancements. There is no fixed amount, you can pay as much as you want. You pay every month only subscription fee and game has no other paid advancements (like faster leveling or paid ingame item). You pay once and play as many time as you wont, even playing online is free after you purchased game once. There's also a lot of talk that this will be the last generation of consoles (why spend $400 on a console when you can get a decent pc for just a little more?) Digital downloads on the other hand are swiftly taking over. SSD's are still too expensive for the storage they provide just to put games on them. I don't believe cartridges will be making a comeback anytime soon. I didn't finish all of the optional tombs and objectives. I had 14 hours in it, but that was just completing the storyline. The shortest game I've played recently was Tomb Raider (2013). Maybe on a speedrun, but certainly not true if you're just playing casually. I really have to disagree with most games only having 5-10 hours of gameplay. Of course, this is only one game, value for your money will vary from developer to developer.
Each major DLC is $10 (regular price, not sale) and includes as much content as the main game storyline. So far I've put 42 hours in it, and am nowhere near completing everything. As an example, I recently bought Borderlands 2 (2012) on sale for $7. But on the other hand, you now have services like Steam offering incredible sales on games that you didn't see very often before. It's reasonable for the game to be more expensive.
I'm not talking about how "fun" it is, but rather the amount of code behind it and the graphical quality, etc. The 'big' games being sold at $60 cost a heck of a lot more to make than they used to, but are higher quality. I would hope most people realize this is a waste, but if people weren't buying into it, developers wouldn't bother. I think that article is really talking about microtransactions, which is a system where you can pay for ingame benefits that aren't included in the price of the game itself.
0 kommentar(er)
